The Life-Blind Structure of the Neoclassical Paradigm: A Critique of Bernard Hodgson's Economics As a Moral Science

This paper achieves two general objectives. It first analyses Bernard Hodgson's Economic As Moral Science as a path-breaking internal critique of neo-classical economic theory, and it then demonstrates that the underlying neo-classical paradigm he presupposes suffers from a deeper-structural my...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McMurtry, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2003
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 377-389
Further subjects:B Consumer Choice
B Neoclassical Theory
B Myopia
B Internal Critique
B Commodity Production
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785619594
003 DE-627
005 20220112043556.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1023605001855  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785619594 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785619594 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a McMurtry, John  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Life-Blind Structure of the Neoclassical Paradigm: A Critique of Bernard Hodgson's Economics As a Moral Science 
264 1 |c 2003 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper achieves two general objectives. It first analyses Bernard Hodgson's Economic As Moral Science as a path-breaking internal critique of neo-classical economic theory, and it then demonstrates that the underlying neo-classical paradigm he presupposes suffers from a deeper-structural myopia than his standpoint recognizes. EMS mainly exposes the a priori moral prescriptions underlying orthodox consumer choice theory – namely, its classical utilitarian ground and four or, as argued here, five hidden universal categorical-ought prescriptions which the theory presupposes as instrumental imperatives: (1) comparability evaluations by all consumer judgements; (2) non-satiety of consumer desire; (3) consistency and transitivity of consumer preferences; (4) diminishing rate of marginal substitution by consumer choice; and (5) an unlimited aggregate growth of commodity production, or "the liberal growth ethic". The article argues that Hodgson's refutation of the neo-classical claims of "value neutral scientific method" is sound, that his bridging of the Humean reason-desire divide by the "rational review" of wants is resonantly demonstrated, and that his argument for conversion of an "a priori-cum-normative-cum-idealized" neoclassical theory into scientific status is logically plausible but morally abhorrent. The principal objection to Hodgson's magisterial exposé of neo-classical doctrine's moral a priorism is that the latter's normative presuppositions are profoundly deranged at a level that he himself assumes as given. In consequence, there is theoretical closure at three levels: (1) to the underlying "life economy" of non-priced and non-profit production and distribution of goods otherwise in short supply; (2) to the "civil commons" infrastructure sustaining these non-commodity systems of social and ecological production and distribution; and (3) to the systemic despoiling of both by monetized market mechanisms which are falsely assumed as the defining limits of "the economy". 
601 |a Paradigma 
601 |a Bernard, G. W. 
650 4 |a Commodity Production 
650 4 |a Neoclassical Theory 
650 4 |a Internal Critique 
650 4 |a Consumer Choice 
650 4 |a Myopia 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 44(2003), 4, Seite 377-389  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2003  |g number:4  |g pages:377-389 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075044  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023605001855  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033678468 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785619594 
LOK |0 005 20220112043556 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#643A39BAF1C0F5F631C7A1F840DB30E230B8E551 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075044 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw