Epistemology, Research Methodology and Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence Versus Eva®
This article questions the continued use and application of EVA® (economic value added) because it is epistemologically a non-sequitur, fails to satisfy the requirements of sound research methodology in terms of being a reliable and valid metric, and is unlikely to satisfy the requirements of Rule 7...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
2003
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 2003, Volume: 44, Issue: 4, Pages: 327-341 |
| Further subjects: | B
cost of capital
B Validity B empirical failure B Rules of evidence B CAPM B valuations B Reliability B EVA® |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 178561956X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043556.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1023692518377 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)178561956X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178561956X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Paulo, Stanley |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Epistemology, Research Methodology and Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence Versus Eva® |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2003 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article questions the continued use and application of EVA® (economic value added) because it is epistemologically a non-sequitur, fails to satisfy the requirements of sound research methodology in terms of being a reliable and valid metric, and is unlikely to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. In the light of these insufficiencies, the continued use of EVA® is ethically questionable, and moreover in time is likely to result in class actions. | ||
| 601 | |a Methodologie | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a valuations | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Validity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Rules of evidence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Reliability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EVA® | |
| 650 | 4 | |a empirical failure | |
| 650 | 4 | |a cost of capital | |
| 650 | 4 | |a CAPM | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 44(2003), 4, Seite 327-341 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2003 |g number:4 |g pages:327-341 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075041 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023692518377 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 44 |j 2003 |e 4 |h 327-341 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033678433 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 178561956X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043556 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#DBA895EA8972BE919B9252A5AA65E8FD59A385CA | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25075041 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||