Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility

The stakeholder approach offers the opportunity to consider corporate responsibility in a wider sense than that afforded by the stockholder or shareholder approaches. Having said that, this article aims to show that this theory does not offer a normative corporate responsibility concept that can be...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: González, Elsa (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2002
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2002, Volume: 39, Issue: 1, Pages: 101-108
Further subjects:B Discourse ethics
B post-conventional perspective
B Business Ethics
B Stakeholder Theory
B Normative approach
B Moral Responsibility
B Responsibility
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785618024
003 DE-627
005 20220112043550.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2002 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1016388102599  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785618024 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785618024 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a González, Elsa  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Defining a Post-Conventional Corporate Moral Responsibility 
264 1 |c 2002 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The stakeholder approach offers the opportunity to consider corporate responsibility in a wider sense than that afforded by the stockholder or shareholder approaches. Having said that, this article aims to show that this theory does not offer a normative corporate responsibility concept that can be our response to two basic questions. On the one hand, for what is the company morally responsible and, on the other hand, why is the corporation morally responsible in terms of conventional and post-conventional perspectives? The reason why the stakeholder approach does not offer such a definition, as we shall see, is because the normative stakeholder approaches tend to confuse the social validity with the moral validity or legitimacy. It leads us to a conventional definition of corporate moral responsibility (CMR) that is not relevant to the pluralistic and global framework of our societies and economies. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate this intuition. 
650 4 |a Stakeholder Theory 
650 4 |a Responsibility 
650 4 |a post-conventional perspective 
650 4 |a Normative approach 
650 4 |a Moral Responsibility 
650 4 |a Discourse ethics 
650 4 |a Business Ethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 39(2002), 1, Seite 101-108  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:39  |g year:2002  |g number:1  |g pages:101-108 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074824  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016388102599  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033676899 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785618024 
LOK |0 005 20220112043550 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#8FFC01B1123F1ACE94E74AE7FAFEF6E6B504FF7D 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074824 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw