Conflicts of Interest? The Ethics of Usury

Social attitudes toward usury (here defined using the archaic meaning as the taking of interest on loans) have changed dramatically over the centuries. From antiquity until the Protestant Reformation, usury was regarded as an inherently evil activity. Today, with few exceptions, usury is met with mo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Lewison, Martin (Verfasst von)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: 1999
In: Journal of business ethics
Jahr: 1999, Band: 22, Heft: 4, Seiten: 327-339
weitere Schlagwörter:B pawnbroking
B Jewish business ethics
B Islamic business ethics
B free loans
B Christian business ethics
B Microlending
B Usury
B microloans
Online-Zugang: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785613138
003 DE-627
005 20220118123533.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1006164904326  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785613138 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785613138 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Lewison, Martin  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Conflicts of Interest? The Ethics of Usury 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Social attitudes toward usury (here defined using the archaic meaning as the taking of interest on loans) have changed dramatically over the centuries. From antiquity until the Protestant Reformation, usury was regarded as an inherently evil activity. Today, with few exceptions, usury is met with moral indifference. Modern objections to usury are limited to protest against "excessive" interest rates rather than interest per se. With this change in focus, the very meaning of the term "usury" has also changed. Many early pronouncements against the taking of interest emphasized the plight of the poor, but ironically, the poor actually pay the highest rates of interest in the modern American economy. Despite the universality of usury, some socio-economic subcultures still manage to avoid the taking or giving of interest. Orthodox branches of both Judaism and Islam have maintained bans on usury throughout the centuries and up to the present time. This is especially interesting in the case of Judaism, given the popular cultural image of the Jew as usurer. Jewish free loan systems may actually offer a model for modern loan programs that can be designed to aid poor borrowers, who are frequently shut out of mainstream financial services. 
650 4 |a Usury 
650 4 |a pawnbroking 
650 4 |a microloans 
650 4 |a Microlending 
650 4 |a Jewish business ethics 
650 4 |a Islamic business ethics 
650 4 |a free loans 
650 4 |a Christian business ethics 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 22(1999), 4, Seite 327-339  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:22  |g year:1999  |g number:4  |g pages:327-339 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074211  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006164904326  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033672001 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785613138 
LOK |0 005 20220112043529 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#D6C0293FBDD22945164A2EF1B96B00171E082237 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074211 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL