The Democratic Firm: An Argument Based on Ordinary Jurisprudence

This paper presents an argument for the democratic (or 'labor-managed') firm based on ordinary jurisprudence. The standard principle of responsibility in jurisprudence ('Assign legal responsibility in accordance with de facto responsibility') implies that the people working in a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ellerman, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1999
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1999, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 111-124
Further subjects:B inalienable rights
B responsibility principle
B democratic firm
B corporate ownership
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785612719
003 DE-627
005 20220112043528.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1006270309843  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785612719 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785612719 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Ellerman, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The Democratic Firm: An Argument Based on Ordinary Jurisprudence 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper presents an argument for the democratic (or 'labor-managed') firm based on ordinary jurisprudence. The standard principle of responsibility in jurisprudence ('Assign legal responsibility in accordance with de facto responsibility') implies that the people working in a firm should legally appropriate the assets and liabilities produced in the firm (the positive and negative fruits of their labor). This appropriation is normally violated due to the employment or self-rental contract. However, we present an inalienable rights argument that descends from the Reformation and Enlightenment which argues that the self-rental contract, like the self-sale or voluntary slavery contract, is inherently invalid. The key intuition of the inalienable rights theory is that one cannot in fact voluntarily transfer de facto responsibility for one's actions to another person. One can only voluntarily co-operate with another person, but then one is de facto jointly responsible for the results. Just as the legal authorities legally reconstruct the criminous employer and employee as a partnership with shared responsibility, so justice demands that every firm be legally reconstructed as a partnership of all who work (working employers and employees) in the enterprise, i.e., as a democratic firm. 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a responsibility principle 
650 4 |a inalienable rights 
650 4 |a democratic firm 
650 4 |a corporate ownership 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 21(1999), 2, Seite 111-124  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:1999  |g number:2  |g pages:111-124 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074160  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006270309843  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 21  |j 1999  |e 2  |h 111-124 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033671587 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785612719 
LOK |0 005 20220112043528 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#DB019101628CAB8FCD743C39B5F4244D6ECA8786 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074160 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw