What's Wrong with "Deceptive" Advertising?

In this paper I present a moral account of the legal notion of deceptive advertising. I argue that no harmful consequences to the consumer need follow from a deceptive advertisement as such, and I suggest instead that one should focus on the consequences of permitting the practise of deceptive adver...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Attas, Daniel (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1999
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1999, Volume: 21, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-59
Further subjects:B Moral Evaluation
B Reasonable Person
B Harmful Consequence
B Economic Growth
B Moral Ground
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785612654
003 DE-627
005 20220112043527.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1005985723779  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785612654 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785612654 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Attas, Daniel  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a What's Wrong with "Deceptive" Advertising? 
264 1 |c 1999 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper I present a moral account of the legal notion of deceptive advertising. I argue that no harmful consequences to the consumer need follow from a deceptive advertisement as such, and I suggest instead that one should focus on the consequences of permitting the practise of deceptive advertising on society as a whole. After a brief account of ‘deceptive advertising’, I move to discuss the role of the reasonable person standard in its definition. One interpretation of this standard is empirical, aiming to objectify the quality of misleadingness in the advertisement. I offer an alternative normative interpretation which aims to draw the line between the advertiser's responsibility and that of the consumer, between misleading and miscomprehension. I then examine and reject several possible moral grounds for condemning and prohibiting deceptive advertising. These include: harm, in the sense of welfare, to the misled consumer; harm to competitors; and a violation or a reduction of the consumer's autonomy. Finally, I explain how the effect of the practise of deceptive advertising on society as a whole should inform our normative line-drawing between misleading and miscomprehension, and how it provides the basis for the moral evaluation of deceptive advertising. 
650 4 |a Moral Evaluation 
650 4 |a Moral Ground 
650 4 |a Reasonable Person 
650 4 |a Harmful Consequence 
650 4 |a Economic Growth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 21(1999), 1, Seite 49-59  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:21  |g year:1999  |g number:1  |g pages:49-59 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074154  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005985723779  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 21  |j 1999  |e 1  |h 49-59 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033671528 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785612654 
LOK |0 005 20220112043527 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#0D1A746D5A5F9535C26A147B8D9B784465EC2D99 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25074154 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw