Strict Product Liability and the Unfairness Objection
In this paper I examine the most common objection to strict product liability: that it is unfair to manufacturers. Critics have maintained that it is unfair because it allows manufacturers to be held liable even when they have not been negligent, and are not morally blameworthy or at fault. In respo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1998
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1998, Volume: 17, Issue: 8, Pages: 885-893 |
| Further subjects: | B
Product User
B Injured Product B Product Liability B Economic Growth B Common Objection |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 178561066X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043518.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1005701111053 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)178561066X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178561066X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Piker, Andrew |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Strict Product Liability and the Unfairness Objection |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1998 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper I examine the most common objection to strict product liability: that it is unfair to manufacturers. Critics have maintained that it is unfair because it allows manufacturers to be held liable even when they have not been negligent, and are not morally blameworthy or at fault. In response to this objection, I argue 1) that there are in fact cases in which it is at least somewhat unfair to manufacturers to impose compensation requirements upon them in accordance with the strict product liability doctrine, but 2) that there is also a class of cases in which it is fair to manufacturers to hold them responsible for compensating injured product users, as strict product liability requires, even though they have not been negligent and are not morally blameworthy or at fault. My analysis of the fairness issue provides a basis for some concluding remarks about the defensibility of the strict product liability doctrine. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Product Liability | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Injured Product | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Product User | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Common Objection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic Growth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 17(1998), 8, Seite 885-893 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:1998 |g number:8 |g pages:885-893 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073133 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005701111053 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 17 |j 1998 |e 8 |h 885-893 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033669531 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 178561066X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043518 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#CFEC072E6A6FDF17A62C7FA1A194ADC34EEEA0D3 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073133 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||