Points of Reference and Individual Differences As Sources of Bias in Ethical Judgments

The authors demonstrate that ethical judgments can be biased when previous judgments serve as a point of reference against which a current situation is judged. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical sales practices were used in an experiment to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Boyle, Brett A. (Author) ; Dahlstrom, Robert F. (Author) ; Kellaris, James J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 1998
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1998, Volume: 17, Issue: 5, Pages: 517-525
Further subjects:B Ethical Judgment
B Current Situation
B Individual Difference
B Contrast Effect
B Economic Growth
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785610341
003 DE-627
005 20220112043517.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1023/A:1017960518974  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785610341 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785610341 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Boyle, Brett A.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Points of Reference and Individual Differences As Sources of Bias in Ethical Judgments 
264 1 |c 1998 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The authors demonstrate that ethical judgments can be biased when previous judgments serve as a point of reference against which a current situation is judged. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical sales practices were used in an experiment to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of an ethically ambiguous target scenario. The target tended to be rated as more ethical by subjects primed with unethical scenarios, and less ethical by subjects primed with ethical scenarios. This "contrast effect," however, is contingent upon individual differences. Specifically, subjects with high (versus low) needs for cognition are more likely to process and use the information presented in the priming scenarios as a point of reference against which to judge the target situation, and hence more prone to the contrastive bias. Implications for avoiding unintentional moral relativism in business decision-making are discussed. 
601 |a Individuation 
650 4 |a Ethical Judgment 
650 4 |a Contrast Effect 
650 4 |a Current Situation 
650 4 |a Individual Difference 
650 4 |a Economic Growth 
700 1 |a Dahlstrom, Robert F.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Kellaris, James J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982  |g 17(1998), 5, Seite 517-525  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:1998  |g number:5  |g pages:517-525 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073100  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017960518974  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033669213 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785610341 
LOK |0 005 20220112043517 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#EE289420F95B1908560B1F8B00835B4EADF8451C 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073100 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw