Points of Reference and Individual Differences As Sources of Bias in Ethical Judgments
The authors demonstrate that ethical judgments can be biased when previous judgments serve as a point of reference against which a current situation is judged. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical sales practices were used in an experiment to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of...
Authors: | ; ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer
1998
|
In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1998, Volume: 17, Issue: 5, Pages: 517-525 |
Further subjects: | B
Ethical Judgment
B Current Situation B Individual Difference B Contrast Effect B Economic Growth |
Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785610341 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220112043517.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220112s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1023/A:1017960518974 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785610341 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785610341 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Boyle, Brett A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Points of Reference and Individual Differences As Sources of Bias in Ethical Judgments |
264 | 1 | |c 1998 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The authors demonstrate that ethical judgments can be biased when previous judgments serve as a point of reference against which a current situation is judged. Scenarios describing ethical or unethical sales practices were used in an experiment to prime subjects who subsequently rated the ethics of an ethically ambiguous target scenario. The target tended to be rated as more ethical by subjects primed with unethical scenarios, and less ethical by subjects primed with ethical scenarios. This "contrast effect," however, is contingent upon individual differences. Specifically, subjects with high (versus low) needs for cognition are more likely to process and use the information presented in the priming scenarios as a point of reference against which to judge the target situation, and hence more prone to the contrastive bias. Implications for avoiding unintentional moral relativism in business decision-making are discussed. | ||
601 | |a Individuation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Ethical Judgment | |
650 | 4 | |a Contrast Effect | |
650 | 4 | |a Current Situation | |
650 | 4 | |a Individual Difference | |
650 | 4 | |a Economic Growth | |
700 | 1 | |a Dahlstrom, Robert F. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kellaris, James J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 17(1998), 5, Seite 517-525 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:17 |g year:1998 |g number:5 |g pages:517-525 |
856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073100 |x JSTOR | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017960518974 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4033669213 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785610341 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220112043517 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#EE289420F95B1908560B1F8B00835B4EADF8451C | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25073100 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw |