Meeting needs and business obligations: An argument for the libertarian skeptic
In this paper I argue that if we are to have any defensible property rights at all, we must recognize a fundamental commitment to helping those in need. The argument has significant implications for all who claim defensible property rights. In this paper I concentrate on some of the implications thi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1996
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1996, Volume: 15, Issue: 6, Pages: 695-702 |
| Further subjects: | B
Stakeholder Theory
B Significant Implication B Fundamental Commitment B Normative Basis B Economic Growth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785607626 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043505.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00411804 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785607626 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785607626 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brock, Gillian |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Meeting needs and business obligations: An argument for the libertarian skeptic |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In this paper I argue that if we are to have any defensible property rights at all, we must recognize a fundamental commitment to helping those in need. The argument has significant implications for all who claim defensible property rights. In this paper I concentrate on some of the implications this argument has for redefining business obligations. In particular, I show why those who typically would be quite resistant to the idea that businesses have any obligations to assist others in need must acknowledge this fundamental obligation. I also suggest how this argument contributes to our understanding of the normative basis of Stakeholder Theory. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Fundamental Commitment | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Normative Basis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Stakeholder Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Significant Implication | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic Growth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982 |g 15(1996), 6, Seite 695-702 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:1996 |g number:6 |g pages:695-702 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072795 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00411804 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 15 |j 1996 |e 6 |h 695-702 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033666494 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785607626 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043505 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#4D639D12D5DE7EE25AA34BF80B82A4726BE4B208 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072795 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||