Adam Smith's invisible hand argument

Adam Smith is usually thought to argue that the result of everyone pursuing their own interests will be the maximization of the interests of society. The invisible hand of the free market will transform the individual's pursuit of gain into the general utility of society. This is the invisible...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bishop, John D. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 1995
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 1995, Volume: 14, Issue: 3, Pages: 165-180
Further subjects:B Similar Restriction
B Maximum Profit
B Free Market
B Defend
B Economic Growth
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785606115
003 DE-627
005 20220112043459.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF00881431  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785606115 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785606115 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Bishop, John D.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Adam Smith's invisible hand argument 
264 1 |c 1995 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Adam Smith is usually thought to argue that the result of everyone pursuing their own interests will be the maximization of the interests of society. The invisible hand of the free market will transform the individual's pursuit of gain into the general utility of society. This is the invisible hand argument., Many people, although Smith did not, draw a moral corollary from this argument, and use it to defend the moral acceptability of pursuing one's own self-interest., Smith does use the invisible hand argument; however, a close reading of theWealth of Nations reveals that Smith thought the interests of merchants and manufacturers were fundamentally opposed to those of society in general, and that they had an inherent tendency to deceive and oppress society while pursuing their own interests. How can these two views of what results when merchants and manufactures pursue their self-interest be made compatible? It is argued that the invisible hand argument when applied to merchants and manufacturers, (its application to labour and landlords is only mentioned briefly), is extremely restrictive, and that similar restrictions must apply to the moral corollary. In particular, the invisible hand argument applies only to investing capital in one's own country for maximum profit. 
601 |a Smith, Adam 
601 |a Argumentation 
650 4 |a Similar Restriction 
650 4 |a Maximum Profit 
650 4 |a Free Market 
650 4 |a Defend 
650 4 |a Economic Growth 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of business ethics  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1982  |g 14(1995), 3, Seite 165-180  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)270937129  |w (DE-600)1478688-6  |w (DE-576)121465284  |x 1573-0697  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:14  |g year:1995  |g number:3  |g pages:165-180 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072635  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00881431  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 14  |j 1995  |e 3  |h 165-180 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403366498X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785606115 
LOK |0 005 20220112043459 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#E0DC61F2223F0EF6B48F72F306B39977955B24B5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25072635 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw