Employers' pay practices and potential responses to “comparable worth” litigation an identification of research issues
“Comparable worth” is a controversial compensation strategy. In this paper, research issues that arise when employers perform point-based job evaluations, but deviate from them because of “market” factors, are discussed. Greater research attention to the actual operation of markets and to the conseq...
Auteurs: | ; ; |
---|---|
Type de support: | Électronique Article |
Langue: | Anglais |
Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publié: |
Springer Science + Business Media B. V
1988
|
Dans: |
Journal of business ethics
Année: 1988, Volume: 7, Numéro: 5, Pages: 347-358 |
Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Potential Response
B Research Attention B Compensation Strategy B Research Issue B Economic Growth |
Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Résumé: | “Comparable worth” is a controversial compensation strategy. In this paper, research issues that arise when employers perform point-based job evaluations, but deviate from them because of “market” factors, are discussed. Greater research attention to the actual operation of markets and to the consequences of conflicts in equity perceptions is encouraged. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1573-0697 |
Contient: | Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00382537 |