In defense of social responsibility
The purpose of the present article is to argue against the minimalist theory of social responsibility (i.e., that the sole responsibility of business is to maximize profit in conformity with law), particularly as it is advanced by Butler D. Shaffer. Against this view, I argue that such a theory does...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer
1983
|
| In: |
Journal of business ethics
Year: 1983, Volume: 2, Issue: 2, Pages: 111-122 |
| Further subjects: | B
Minimalist Theory
B Great Level B Social Responsibility B Present Article B Economic Growth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785594745 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043413.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s1983 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00381702 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785594745 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785594745 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Brummer, James J. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In defense of social responsibility |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1983 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of the present article is to argue against the minimalist theory of social responsibility (i.e., that the sole responsibility of business is to maximize profit in conformity with law), particularly as it is advanced by Butler D. Shaffer. Against this view, I argue that such a theory does not necessarily support or achieve greater levels of corporate efficiency than does a more demanding theory of social responsibility, and that the argument for the former view is no more valueneutral than for the latter. Finally, I argue that Shaffer fails to show that the more maximal theory demands too much from executives and is too unclear to be applicable to their decision-making. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Minimalist Theory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Great Level | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Present Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Social Responsibility | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Economic Growth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of business ethics |d Dordrecht : Springer, 1982 |g 2(1983), 2, Seite 111-122 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937129 |w (DE-600)1478688-6 |w (DE-576)121465284 |x 1573-0697 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:2 |g year:1983 |g number:2 |g pages:111-122 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/25071383 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00381702 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033653619 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785594745 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043413 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-31#6A8A43A574BCBBF731B089A2B5C19F66C53DE865 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/25071383 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||