RT Article
T1 On the cannot of infallibility
JF Sophia
VO 44
IS 1
SP 125
OP 127
A1 Blum, Alex
LA English
YR 2005
UL https://ixtheo.de/Record/1785593765
AB We content that a very seductive argument for theological fatalism fails. In the course of our discussion we point out that theological fatalism is incompatible with the existence of a being who is omnipotent, omniscient and infallible. We end by suggesting that ‘possible’ formalized as ‘◊’ is to be understood as ‘can or could have been’ and not simply as ‘can’. The argument we discuss conflates the two.
K1 Intended Target
K1 Logical Study
K1 Religious Study
K1 Strong Argument
K1 Modal Logic
DO 10.1007/BF02780486