Is the status principle beyond salvation? toward redeeming an unpopular theory of hell

In this paper I examine a recent objection to the retributive punishment theory of hell, specifically that the theory entails something obviously false: that it is possible to commit an infinite sin. I defend the moral principle behind one account of infinite sin, a principle referred to as the Stat...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kabay, Paul (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands 2005
In: Sophia
Year: 2005, Volume: 44, Issue: 1, Pages: 91-103
Further subjects:B Moral Judgement
B Moral Status
B Status Principle
B Thought Experiment
B Moral Character
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785593749
003 DE-627
005 20220112043409.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02780484  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785593749 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785593749 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Kabay, Paul  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Is the status principle beyond salvation? toward redeeming an unpopular theory of hell 
264 1 |c 2005 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In this paper I examine a recent objection to the retributive punishment theory of hell, specifically that the theory entails something obviously false: that it is possible to commit an infinite sin. I defend the moral principle behind one account of infinite sin, a principle referred to as the Status Principle (that other things being equal the higher the status of the offended the party, the more serious the sin). I show that recent objections to this principle are far from conclusive, and that the principle is more plausible than perhaps initially thought. 
650 4 |a Status Principle 
650 4 |a Moral Character 
650 4 |a Moral Status 
650 4 |a Thought Experiment 
650 4 |a Moral Judgement 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 44(2005), 1, Seite 91-103  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:44  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g pages:91-103 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02780484  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033652612 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785593749 
LOK |0 005 20220112043409 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#135BB858BFB2123BC73299207A4F31BB38772B61 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw