A Cross-cultural and Buddhist-Friendly Interpretation of the Typology Exclusivism-Inclusivism-Pluralism

This article develops a new and expanded interpretation of the typology exclusivism, inclusivism, pluralism. The proposal refines the categories of what was originally a Christian typology in order to provide a truly cross-cultural and interreligious framework to better understand and compare the mo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vélez de Cea, Abraham (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2011
In: Sophia
Year: 2011, Volume: 50, Issue: 3, Pages: 453
Further subjects:B Exclusivism
B Pluralism
B Buddhism
B Panikkar
B Hedges
B Knitter
B Griffin
B Inclusivism
B Hick
B Schmidt-Leukel
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785591681
003 DE-627
005 20220112043400.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-011-0242-8  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785591681 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785591681 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Vélez de Cea, Abraham  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 2 |a A Cross-cultural and Buddhist-Friendly Interpretation of the Typology Exclusivism-Inclusivism-Pluralism 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article develops a new and expanded interpretation of the typology exclusivism, inclusivism, pluralism. The proposal refines the categories of what was originally a Christian typology in order to provide a truly cross-cultural and interreligious framework to better understand and compare the most common views of religious diversity found not only in Christianity, but also in Buddhism and other religions. Although building upon Schmidt-Leukel's logical reinterpretation of the typology, the article substantially modifies his framework and understands the typology, not as a comprehensive classification of possible attitudes toward other religions, but rather as an open-ended framework to clarify the nature of the most common theologies of religions that exist in reality. The new interpretation provides a more precise definition of inclusivism that does not conflate inclusivism with the affirmation of a singular maximum, thus distinguishing between absolutistic and non-absolutistic forms of inclusivism. The new interpretation introduces an intermediate position between inclusivism and pluralism called pluralistic inclusivism. The article challenges David Ray Griffin's concept of generic pluralism and proposes a new understanding of pluralism indebted to Raimundo Panikkar. 
601 |a Interpretation 
601 |a Typologie 
650 4 |a Hedges 
650 4 |a Knitter 
650 4 |a Griffin 
650 4 |a Schmidt-Leukel 
650 4 |a Hick 
650 4 |a Panikkar 
650 4 |a Exclusivism 
650 4 |a Inclusivism 
650 4 |a Pluralism 
650 4 |a Buddhism 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 50(2011), 3, Seite 453  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2011  |g number:3  |g pages:453 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-011-0242-8  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033650555 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785591681 
LOK |0 005 20220112043400 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#438C6765B0153DB7E04898AF671D3F88D0B19656 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw