Grading Religions

This essay develops standards for grading religions including various forms of spiritualism. First, I examine the standards proposed by William James, John Hick, Paul Knitter, Dan Cohn-Sherbok, and Harold Netland. Most of them are useful in grading religions with or without conditions. However, thos...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Iwasa, Noriaki (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands 2011
In: Sophia
Year: 2011, Volume: 50, Issue: 1, Pages: 189-209
Further subjects:B Evaluation
B Ranking
B Religion
B Standard
B Spiritualism
B Criteria
B Grading
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785591541
003 DE-627
005 20220112043400.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-010-0199-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785591541 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785591541 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Iwasa, Noriaki  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Grading Religions 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This essay develops standards for grading religions including various forms of spiritualism. First, I examine the standards proposed by William James, John Hick, Paul Knitter, Dan Cohn-Sherbok, and Harold Netland. Most of them are useful in grading religions with or without conditions. However, those standards are not enough for refined and piercing evaluation. Thus, I introduce standards used in spiritualism. Although those standards are for grading spirits and their teachings, they are useful in refined and piercing evaluation of religious phenomena. The spiritual standards complement James’s, Hick’s, Knitter’s, and Netland’s standards. Although most of the spiritual standards are rationally unjustifiable, they have practical value. 
601 |a Religion 
650 4 |a Standard 
650 4 |a Criteria 
650 4 |a Ranking 
650 4 |a Grading 
650 4 |a Evaluation 
650 4 |a Spiritualism 
650 4 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 50(2011), 1, Seite 189-209  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:50  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:189-209 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-010-0199-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033650415 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785591541 
LOK |0 005 20220112043400 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#7E4DB8A6D6E2EA447BF5C55B43104784EAC7977E 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Evaluation,Ranking,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Palmarès,Classement,Classement,Religion,Religions,Religion,Évaluation 
STC 0 0 |a Evaluación,Ranking,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Ranking,Religione,Religione,Religione,Valutazione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,排名,等级,评估,评定,评价 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,排名,等級,評估,評定,評價 
STG 0 0 |a Avaliação,Ranking,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Классификация,Оценивание,Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Αξιολόγηση,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Κατάταξη 
SYE 0 0 |a Rangreihenverfahren,Ranking-Verfahren , Evaluierung , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie