Getting God Out of Our (Modal) Business

Some hold that if we can imagine God creating a world in which a particular proposition (p) is true, then we can conclude that p is possible. I argue that such appeals to God can’t provide us with a guide to possibility. For either God’s powers aren’t co-extensive with the possible or they are. And...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hanrahan, Rebecca (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2009
In: Sophia
Year: 2009, Volume: 48, Issue: 4, Pages: 379-391
Further subjects:B Conceivability
B Possibility
B Euthyphro’s Dilemma
B God
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002c 4500
001 1785590715
003 DE-627
005 20220112043355.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11841-009-0138-z  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785590715 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785590715 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hanrahan, Rebecca  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Getting God Out of Our (Modal) Business 
264 1 |c 2009 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Some hold that if we can imagine God creating a world in which a particular proposition (p) is true, then we can conclude that p is possible. I argue that such appeals to God can’t provide us with a guide to possibility. For either God’s powers aren’t co-extensive with the possible or they are. And if they are, these appeals either beg the question or court a version of Euthyphro’s Dilemma. Some may argue that such appeals were only intended to prompt us to think broadly about the modal claim at issue. I argue instead that these appeals must be understood as more than mere prompts. For it is these appeals that would, if successful, render the conceivability principle viable. 
650 4 |a Euthyphro’s Dilemma 
650 4 |a Possibility 
650 4 |a Conceivability 
650 4 |a God 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 48(2009), 4, Seite 379-391  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:48  |g year:2009  |g number:4  |g pages:379-391 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-009-0138-z  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033649581 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785590715 
LOK |0 005 20220112043355 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#3F1E9CAD87F11CB791EA44F642DB21624D635A12 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw