Natural theology: Theism or antitheism?
I propose that reasons advanced in support of theism serve just as well, or can be modified to serve just as well, as reasons for believing that there exists a wholly evil supreme being (‘antitheism’). Accordingly, I suggest that attempts to justify theism are futile, since all would-be success is n...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
1997
|
| In: |
Sophia
Jahr: 1997, Band: 36, Heft: 1, Seiten: 75-83 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Moral Goodness
B Ontological Argument B Theistic Argument B Natural Theology B Moral Argument |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | I propose that reasons advanced in support of theism serve just as well, or can be modified to serve just as well, as reasons for believing that there exists a wholly evil supreme being (‘antitheism’). Accordingly, I suggest that attempts to justify theism are futile, since all would-be success is neutralized by the corresponding support that is thereby provided for antitheism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF02786044 |
