Natural theology: Theism or antitheism?
I propose that reasons advanced in support of theism serve just as well, or can be modified to serve just as well, as reasons for believing that there exists a wholly evil supreme being (‘antitheism’). Accordingly, I suggest that attempts to justify theism are futile, since all would-be success is n...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
1997
|
| В: |
Sophia
Год: 1997, Том: 36, Выпуск: 1, Страницы: 75-83 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Moral Goodness
B Ontological Argument B Theistic Argument B Natural Theology B Moral Argument |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | I propose that reasons advanced in support of theism serve just as well, or can be modified to serve just as well, as reasons for believing that there exists a wholly evil supreme being (‘antitheism’). Accordingly, I suggest that attempts to justify theism are futile, since all would-be success is neutralized by the corresponding support that is thereby provided for antitheism. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1873-930X |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Sophia
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF02786044 |
