The old and the new sublimes: Do they signify? God?

It is not the case that God is interestingly like the unavailable transcendental signified in being unavailable. God always was absconded. The signified may not even really have gone away at all. And if it has, it is not God; it is only like Him in having gone away. And it has gone away, if it has,...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hutchings, Patrick (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Netherlands 1995
In: Sophia
Year: 1995, Volume: 34, Issue: 1, Pages: 49-64
Further subjects:B Lunar Eclipse
B False Friend
B Critical Problem
B Absolute Idealism
B Natural Theology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 178558703X
003 DE-627
005 20220112043337.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/BF02772447  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)178558703X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP178558703X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hutchings, Patrick  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 4 |a The old and the new sublimes: Do they signify? God? 
264 1 |c 1995 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a It is not the case that God is interestingly like the unavailable transcendental signified in being unavailable. God always was absconded. The signified may not even really have gone away at all. And if it has, it is not God; it is only like Him in having gone away. And it has gone away, if it has, in a different mode of ‘going away’., To use a Turneresque metaphor: God is and will always be another, far, range behind the misty-but-glittering and absconded signifieds, which leave only the trace which is the play of signifiers in the immediate foreground., One is free to attend to whichever range one wishes, or one may attend only to the foreground. But the dazzlingsublime 12 of the foreground, “That change of cloud and light, never-ending and agitating itself into kaleidoscopic patterns, the play of signifiers”, is—and never could be—quite like the “sublime” of the far, far range whose Inhabitant is said to be, “From everlasting to everlasting”. His “play” is said to be not of signifiers, butof all there is; it is notsemiological butontological. And He is altogether beyond the sublime, for with Him, or with the Beatific Vision of Her,there would be no critical problem left., The Logos is not a signifier. 
650 4 |a False Friend 
650 4 |a Absolute Idealism 
650 4 |a Lunar Eclipse 
650 4 |a Natural Theology 
650 4 |a Critical Problem 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Sophia  |d Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1962  |g 34(1995), 1, Seite 49-64  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)543988392  |w (DE-600)2386792-9  |w (DE-576)271774215  |x 1873-930X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:34  |g year:1995  |g number:1  |g pages:49-64 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02772447  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403364590X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 178558703X 
LOK |0 005 20220112043337 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-30#2B560CAB435DB9ADF3F01710EFBB18B2AFA98FA5 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw