The contingency argument—A reply
Brian Medlin has excluded the possibility of something being self-explanatory in anything but a logical sense. Hence any non-logical necessity has always to be in terms of something other than the explicand. In this context, the principle of sufficient reason cannot escape contraction to a form so p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Netherlands
1967
|
| In: |
Sophia
Year: 1967, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: 8-20 |
| Further subjects: | B
Logical Necessity
B Present Actuality B Brute Fact B Sufficient Reason B Logical Truth |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |