On the orthodoxy of Jonathan Edwards

Jonathan Edwards had some strange ideas. He was an idealist like Berkeley. He denied that the world persists through time, claiming that it is continuously created out of nothing by God moment-by-moment. He also denied creaturely causal action in his doctrine of occasionalism. Moreover, he thought t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Crisp, Oliver 1972- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2014
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2014, Volume: 67, Issue: 3, Pages: 304-322
Further subjects:B Pantheism
B Occasionalism
B Dilemma
B Panentheism
B Simplicity
B Orthodoxy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785582070
003 DE-627
005 20220113002644.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0036930614000131  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785582070 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785582070 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)137747624  |0 (DE-627)595596770  |0 (DE-576)188810358  |4 aut  |a Crisp, Oliver  |d 1972- 
109 |a Crisp, Oliver 1972-  |a Crisp, Oliver D. 1972- 
245 1 0 |a On the orthodoxy of Jonathan Edwards 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jonathan Edwards had some strange ideas. He was an idealist like Berkeley. He denied that the world persists through time, claiming that it is continuously created out of nothing by God moment-by-moment. He also denied creaturely causal action in his doctrine of occasionalism. Moreover, he thought that the world is the necessary output of the essential creativity of the deity, embracing the idea that this is the best possible world. Often these views are not reported in popular accounts of his work, though they are widely known in the scholarly community. But is his position theologically orthodox? This article argues that he is faced with an Edwardsian Dilemma: Either he must admit that his theology proper implies that God is not metaphysically simple, or he must embrace pantheism. Neither horn seems particularly attractive. Of the two, the second seems less appealing than the first. Nevertheless, it looks as if the logic of his position presses in this direction. His idealism and Neoplatonic conception of God's necessary emanation of the world imply panentheism. When coupled with his doctrine of divine simplicity, it looks as if his position could be pressed in a pantheist direction. However, if he opts for the first horn, he must deny the doctrine of divine simplicity, which he endorses in a range of works. If God is simple, then it looks as if all his ideas imply one another and the divine essence. Yet the world is an emanation of divine ideas, which Edwards believes God constantly ‘communicates’. Suppose with Edwards that the world is an ordered series of divine ideas. Then it looks as if they must imply each other and the divine nature as well, given divine simplicity. Clearly this is intolerable, as far as orthodoxy goes. One option is for the Edwardsian to revise divine simplicity, so that God is merely a metaphysical simple like a soul. Then he may have distinct states and properties. However, in addition to this revision one would need to amend Edwards’ occasionalism because it provides an apparently insuperable problem of evil for his metaphysics. Thus, revising the first horn involves more than a little tinkering with the deep structures of Edwards’ thought. However, I argue that this is what the Edwardsian must do if she wants to hold onto a broadly orthodox Edwardsian view on these matters. 
601 |a Edwards, Jonathan 
650 4 |a Simplicity 
650 4 |a Pantheism 
650 4 |a Panentheism 
650 4 |a Orthodoxy 
650 4 |a Occasionalism 
650 4 |a Dilemma 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Scottish journal of theology  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948  |g 67(2014), 3, Seite 304-322  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)342893688  |w (DE-600)2072577-2  |w (DE-576)097935182  |x 1475-3065  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:67  |g year:2014  |g number:3  |g pages:304-322 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1640573828  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930614000131  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/on-the-orthodoxy-of-jonathan-edwards/4A6EEDD35B83084E78BC5043E55983DF  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033640940 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785582070 
LOK |0 005 20220112043314 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#61DD5960FEA3005DE1D4C3332C6B0A24E2ADC327 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Dilemma 
STB 0 0 |a Dilemme 
STC 0 0 |a Dilema 
STD 0 0 |a Dilemma 
STE 0 0 |a 进退两难窘境,困境,两难情况 
STF 0 0 |a 進退兩難窘境,困境,兩難情況 
STG 0 0 |a Dilema 
STH 0 0 |a Дилемма 
STI 0 0 |a Δίλημμα