Resistance and Romans 13 in Samuel Rutherford's Lex, Rex

The many conflicts around the reformation of religion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries drew the problem of political resistance to the forefront of European political thought. Thinkers in all of the various religious camps considered scripture to be politically normative. Consequently, bot...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McAnnally-Linz, Ryan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2013
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2013, Volume: 66, Issue: 2, Pages: 140-158
Further subjects:B British Civil Wars
B Reformed Theology
B Samuel Rutherford
B Political Theology
B Biblical Interpretation
B Revolution
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002c 4500
001 1785581260
003 DE-627
005 20220113002642.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0036930613000057  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785581260 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785581260 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)103824501X  |0 (DE-627)756816580  |0 (DE-576)392127520  |4 aut  |a McAnnally-Linz, Ryan 
109 |a McAnnally-Linz, Ryan  |a Linz, Ryan  |a MacAnnally, Ryan  |a McAnnally, Ryan  |a MacAnnally-Linz, Ryan  |a Mac Annally, Ryan 
245 1 0 |a Resistance and Romans 13 in Samuel Rutherford's Lex, Rex 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The many conflicts around the reformation of religion in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries drew the problem of political resistance to the forefront of European political thought. Thinkers in all of the various religious camps considered scripture to be politically normative. Consequently, both pro- and anti-resistance thinkers from a variety of traditions had to engage with Romans 13:1–7, Paul's apparently definitive pronouncement in favour of obedience and, therefore, against resistance. The opponents of resistance could cite Romans 13 with fairly little explanation, but the resisters and revolutionaries faced the challenge of working with the text to draw different political conclusions from it without violating the ‘literal’ sense that they almost universally held to be authoritative. Some even aimed to bring Paul forward as a staunch supporter of the sort of violent political resistance they advocated.Lex, Rex, the political tract of seventeenth-century Scottish theologian Samuel Rutherford (1600–1661), represents a particularly comprehensive early modern justification for violent resistance against a political sovereign. Rutherford was a member of the party of the radical covenanters, who vehemently opposed the church reforms of Charles I and, when hostilities began, fervently supported the war against the king. This article explores the series of arguments, distinctions and theological moves that Rutherford employs to incorporate Romans 13 as a central supporting text for his pro-resistance argument. Among these are: the distinction between God's immediate institution of governmental power and the constitution of particular governments mediately through the people, the positing of a conditional covenant agreed upon at the constitution of any government, the scholastic distinction between voluntas beneplaciti and voluntas signi in the divine will, and the distinction between the royal office in abstracto and its concrete occupant. Using these and other arguments and distinctions, Rutherford constructs a conceptual apparatus that is able, to a great extent, to appropriate Paul's exhortation to obedience in the service of a justification of resistance. In so doing, Rutherford illustrates some of the array of theological and philosophical resources that early modern resistance theorists could marshal in support of their cause, while still maintaining their fundamental theological commitments. 
601 |a Rutherford, Samuel 
650 4 |a Samuel Rutherford 
650 4 |a Revolution 
650 4 |a Reformed Theology 
650 4 |a Political Theology 
650 4 |a British Civil Wars 
650 4 |a Biblical Interpretation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Scottish journal of theology  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948  |g 66(2013), 2, Seite 140-158  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)342893688  |w (DE-600)2072577-2  |w (DE-576)097935182  |x 1475-3065  |7 nnas 
773 1 8 |g volume:66  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:140-158 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930613000057  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/resistance-and-romans-13-in-samuel-rutherfords-lex-rex/E91ECA30D294829A6CFFDC478B5B69B3  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext  |7 1 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033640134 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785581260 
LOK |0 005 20220112043311 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#7C1062D12A9181600128C2EE46963415B9272F09 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
LOK |0 939   |a 12-01-22  |b l01 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
STA 0 0 |a Revolution,Germany,Revolutions,Revolutions in art 
STB 0 0 |a Révolution,Révolution,Révolution (1848) 
STC 0 0 |a Revolución,Revolución,Revolución (1848) 
STD 0 0 |a Rivoluzione,Rivoluzione,Rivoluzione (1848) 
STE 0 0 |a 革命,革命,革命,变革,变革,变革 
STF 0 0 |a 革命,革命,革命,變革,變革,變革 
STG 0 0 |a Revolução,Revolução,Revolução (1848) 
STH 0 0 |a Революция (мотив),Революция,Революция (Германия, 1848) 
STI 0 0 |a Επανάσταση (μοτίβο),Επανάσταση,Επανάσταση (1848) 
SYE 0 0 |a Staatsumwälzung,Revolutionen,Achtzehnhundertachtundvierzig,Februarrevolution,Märzrevolution