Bridging the gulf between biblical scholars and theologians: Can Barth and Wright provide an answer?

There was a time when the interpretation of the Bible was a seamless integrated theological activity. Today, the separation of biblical studies from theologically interested exegesis amongst theologians encourages a sceptical arms-length relationship between Old and New Testament scholars and theolo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Michielin, Maico (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2008
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2008, Volume: 61, Issue: 4, Pages: 420-434
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785578189
003 DE-627
005 20220112043258.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0036930608004183  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785578189 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785578189 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Michielin, Maico  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Bridging the gulf between biblical scholars and theologians: Can Barth and Wright provide an answer? 
264 1 |c 2008 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a There was a time when the interpretation of the Bible was a seamless integrated theological activity. Today, the separation of biblical studies from theologically interested exegesis amongst theologians encourages a sceptical arms-length relationship between Old and New Testament scholars and theologians. Theologians criticise biblical studies' so-called objective and disinterested approach to interpreting the Bible for requiring scholars of both testaments to suspend their theological convictions. Biblical scholars condemn theologians for misusing biblical texts in support of their own preconceived theological agendas. The article suggests a way to bring these divergent exegetical approaches into conversation in a charitable, yet critical fashion, by comparing Karl Barth and N. T. Wright's exegesis of Romans 3:21–4:25. It concludes that the biblical scholar's and theologian's respective sensitivity to the historical and theological sense of the biblical text can, when brought together, benefit each other's reading of the Bible. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Scottish journal of theology  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948  |g 61(2008), 4, Seite 420-434  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)342893688  |w (DE-600)2072577-2  |w (DE-576)097935182  |x 1475-3065  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2008  |g number:4  |g pages:420-434 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646595955  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930608004183  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/bridging-the-gulf-between-biblical-scholars-and-theologians-can-barth-and-wright-provide-an-answer/8F4F6D6ECD2DB9251A982B2978249536  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033637052 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785578189 
LOK |0 005 20220112043258 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#DF96199B4B7A29F08B34C643AA4A31BC3D220733 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB