A response from Amy Plantinga Pauw

In his review of my book, Steven Studebaker asserts that Jonathan Edwards's trinitarianism is useful in challenging ‘the common assumption that Western Augustinian trinitarianism is inherently monistic and must be transcended by recourse to the Eastern trinitarian tradition’. While I find Edwar...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pauw, Amy Plantinga (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2004
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2004, Volume: 57, Issue: 4, Pages: 486-489
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1785576100
003 DE-627
005 20220112043249.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220112s2004 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0036930604000389  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785576100 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785576100 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Pauw, Amy Plantinga  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Pauw, Amy Plantinga  |a Plantinga Pauw, Amy 
245 1 2 |a A response from Amy Plantinga Pauw 
264 1 |c 2004 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his review of my book, Steven Studebaker asserts that Jonathan Edwards's trinitarianism is useful in challenging ‘the common assumption that Western Augustinian trinitarianism is inherently monistic and must be transcended by recourse to the Eastern trinitarian tradition’. While I find Edwards to be theologically useful for a wide variety of reasons, I am in basic agreement with Studebaker's assertion, and certainly do not share in the ‘common assumption’ about Augustinianism that he deplores. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Scottish journal of theology  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948  |g 57(2004), 4, Seite 486-489  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)342893688  |w (DE-600)2072577-2  |w (DE-576)097935182  |x 1475-3065  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:57  |g year:2004  |g number:4  |g pages:486-489 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930604000389  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/response-from-amy-plantinga-pauw/EFBD2EEBDC10C59CE5DC106F7C453E26  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4033634975 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785576100 
LOK |0 005 20220112043249 
LOK |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#C141099BAD616FB8A587776D19693EB4EDAB9AE6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw