The Certainty of faith and Tillich's concept of the analogia imaginis
Paul Tillich's rejection of any attempt to substantiate faith and christological doctrine by extracting from the gospels a biographical picture of Jesus is well known. The reasons he gives in the second volume of Systematic Theology are by no means unusual and certainly not intended to be origi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1972
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 1972, Volume: 25, Issue: 3, Pages: 279-295 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785552058 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220113002535.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s1972 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0036930600028246 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785552058 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785552058 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)120248921 |0 (DE-627)080551041 |0 (DE-576)162474253 |4 aut |a Palmer, Michael |d 1945- | |
| 109 | |a Palmer, Michael 1945- |a Palmer, Michael F. 1945- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Certainty of faith and Tillich's concept of the analogia imaginis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1972 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Paul Tillich's rejection of any attempt to substantiate faith and christological doctrine by extracting from the gospels a biographical picture of Jesus is well known. The reasons he gives in the second volume of Systematic Theology are by no means unusual and certainly not intended to be original. So, for example, we find a basic agreement with Bultmann that, in view of the kerygmatic nature of the gospels, it is illicit to make the liberal Protestant distinction between the man Jesus and Jesus the Christ, in order to confine attention to the allegedly recoverable ‘Jesus of history’. Tillich develops this argument in terms of the inseparability of the ‘fact’ of Jesus and his ‘reception’ as the Christ within the event ‘Jesus as the Christ’, and maintains accordingly that biblical criticism cannot effectually undermine Christology because the empirical truth of Jesus cannot be distinguished apart from the faithful appropriation of that fact, in which the recipient is quite as important as the fact itself. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scottish journal of theology |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948 |g 25(1972), 3, Seite 279-295 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)342893688 |w (DE-600)2072577-2 |w (DE-576)097935182 |x 1475-3065 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:1972 |g number:3 |g pages:279-295 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930600028246 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/certainty-of-faith-and-tillichs-concept-of-the-analogia-imaginis/4AD0FE4C82DFF19EAAEFDEE5E963B8E0 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033610928 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785552058 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043101 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#2E42A3E418036716F08A232089DCAF101974BC5B | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||