Myth and Symbol:I. Tillich's Definition of Unbroken Myth
Paul Tillich did not contribute a detailed essay to the discussion of the programme of ‘Entmythologisierung’ (demythologising) as did Karl Barth or Karl Jaspers. However, it will not escape the reader of his works that Tillich has often expressed his views on this theme, though it be only by a brief...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1965
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Year: 1965, Volume: 18, Issue: 4, Pages: 411-434 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1785547089 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220112043035.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220112s1965 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0036930600015106 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1785547089 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785547089 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Rosenthal, Klaus |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Myth and Symbol:I. Tillich's Definition of Unbroken Myth |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1965 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Paul Tillich did not contribute a detailed essay to the discussion of the programme of ‘Entmythologisierung’ (demythologising) as did Karl Barth or Karl Jaspers. However, it will not escape the reader of his works that Tillich has often expressed his views on this theme, though it be only by a brief reference. The question of the interpretation of myth has not only engaged him during the last decade; on the contrary, more than 30 years ago, Tillich had explained his position in systematic form in the article on myth in the 2nd edition of Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Tillich has not substantially departed from the essential points of this position. On the one hand, Tillich is concerned with the fundamental distinction between unbroken and broken myth, and on the other hand, with the equally characteristic relation which he draws between myth and symbol. These definitions and questions permit us in the following detailed interpretation to construct a form adequate to Tillich's thinking. First we will present Tillich's understanding of unbroken myth, and second, his definition of broken myth, which in its determining points is an interpretation having recourse to his definition of symbol. | ||
| 601 | |a Definition | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Scottish journal of theology |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1948 |g 18(1965), 4, Seite 411-434 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)342893688 |w (DE-600)2072577-2 |w (DE-576)097935182 |x 1475-3065 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:18 |g year:1965 |g number:4 |g pages:411-434 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0036930600015106 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/scottish-journal-of-theology/article/myth-and-symboli-tillichs-definition-of-unbroken-myth/18C7834E1F087936E4EA580A25872A50 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4033605959 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1785547089 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220112043035 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220112||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-01-05#E08DE7AD716BE3D114AAA943A3CE25344B33A34C | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||