Qui a dit qu’Adam avait péché ?: Adam et Ève dans les Homélies pseudo-clémentines

In both forms of the so-called Pseudo-Clementines, the Homilies and the Recognitions, Adam and Eve are subject to several different interpretations. Adam appears at first in the Homilies as part of the system of doctrines of the true prophet, the false pericopes and the syzygies (Hom II-III), where...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Amsler, Frédéric (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:French
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brepols 2014
In: Apocrypha
Year: 2014, Volume: 25, Pages: 195-210
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1785252674
003 DE-627
005 20220711153410.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220109s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c
024 7 |a 10.1484/J.APOCRA.5.103632  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1785252674 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1785252674 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a fre 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)105568834X  |0 (DE-627)79374024X  |0 (DE-576)411301160  |4 aut  |a Amsler, Frédéric 
109 |a Amsler, Frédéric  |a Amsler, F. 
245 1 0 |a Qui a dit qu’Adam avait péché ?  |b Adam et Ève dans les Homélies pseudo-clémentines 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In both forms of the so-called Pseudo-Clementines, the Homilies and the Recognitions, Adam and Eve are subject to several different interpretations. Adam appears at first in the Homilies as part of the system of doctrines of the true prophet, the false pericopes and the syzygies (Hom II-III), where he is depicted as without sin, and yet still reponsible for the evil brought via his relationship with Eve. The Homelist then develops another explanation for the origin of evil in Hom VIII-X in connection with the henochian theme of the fall of the angels. According to this second explanation, evil arises because humanity’s ingratitude. Finally in Hom XIX-XX, the author assumes his own version of the philosophical theory of the four elements and suggests that evil originated as a result of their mixture. He tries, however, to combine this philosophical theory with biblical data.These successive explanations constitute neither a series of repentances, nor a weaving together of awkwardly harmonized editorial strands. They should instead be understood as forming a broad theological project that seeks to demonstrate that no explanation of the origin of evil could ever justifiably cast God as the author of evil or compromise his absolute justice. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Apocrypha  |d Turnhout : Brepols, 1990  |g 25(2014), Seite 195-210  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)511913214  |w (DE-600)2234341-6  |w (DE-576)25402727X  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2014  |g pages:195-210 
776 0 8 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druck-Ausgabe  |a Amsler, Frédéric  |t Qui a dit qu’Adam avait péché ?  |d 2014  |w (DE-627)1634260716  |w (DE-576)444789642  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.5.103632  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.APOCRA.5.103632  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a BIIN 
951 |a AR 
BIB |a 1 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4032177988 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1785252674 
LOK |0 005 20220109112846 
LOK |0 008 220109||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135-1  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135-1 
LOK |0 852 1  |m p  |9 00 
LOK |0 852 2  |b www / FTH Z4-035 (Print)  |9 00 
LOK |0 85640  |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00618473 
LOK |0 935   |a inzs  |a inzo 
LOK |0 938   |k p 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
SUB |a BIB