Quelle était la langue originelle du pseudépigraphe conservé en copte sous Ie titre de Paralipomènes de Jérémie et en arabe sous Ie titre de Captivité des fils d'Israel à Babylone ?
The present study deals with the Coptic Arabic and Garshuni versions of the Paralipomena of Jeremiah. After an extensive confrontation of theses versions, the following results can be suggested: 1. the original should be written in Egypt as well as the Coptic and Arabic versions; 2. according to sev...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | French |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brepols
1995
|
In: |
Apocrypha
Year: 1995, Volume: 6, Pages: 79-92 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1785248995 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220108090648.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 220108s1995 xx |||||o 00| ||fre c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301108 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1785248995 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1785248995 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a fre | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)119291908 |0 (DE-627)080098266 |0 (DE-576)211943029 |4 aut |a Coquin, René Georges |d 1922-1998 | |
109 | |a Coquin, René Georges 1922-1998 |a Coquin, René-Georges 1922-1998 | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Quelle était la langue originelle du pseudépigraphe conservé en copte sous Ie titre de Paralipomènes de Jérémie et en arabe sous Ie titre de Captivité des fils d'Israel à Babylone ? |
264 | 1 | |c 1995 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The present study deals with the Coptic Arabic and Garshuni versions of the Paralipomena of Jeremiah. After an extensive confrontation of theses versions, the following results can be suggested: 1. the original should be written in Egypt as well as the Coptic and Arabic versions; 2. according to several arguments, it appears that the Coptic version is the translation of a Greek original. | ||
601 | |a Babylon | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Apocrypha |d Turnhout : Brepols, 1990 |g 6(1995), Seite 79-92 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)511913214 |w (DE-600)2234341-6 |w (DE-576)25402727X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:1995 |g pages:79-92 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301108 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.brepolsonline.net/doi/abs/10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.301108 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
935 | |a BIIN | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
BIB | |a 1 | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 4031649088 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1785248995 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220108090059 | ||
LOK | |0 008 220108||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 852 2 |b www / FTH Z4-035 (Print) |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 85640 |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/AC00618473 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a inzs |a inzo | ||
LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
SUB | |a BIB |