Standing Still or Running On? Reconsidering Rhetoric in the Strasbourg Anabaptist-Spiritualist Debates, 1530–1531

This article assesses the strikingly different rhetoric used in pamphlets published in 1530 by the Strasbourg Spiritualists Christian Entfelder and Johannes Bünderlin. Whilst these texts are most commonly read in light of their shared critique of Anabaptism, this article argues that Bünderlin's...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Brand, Paul (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2011
In: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 2011, Volume: 62, Issue: 1, Pages: 20-37
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1784770264
003 DE-627
005 20220105044120.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0022046909991291  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784770264 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784770264 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Brand, Paul  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Standing Still or Running On? Reconsidering Rhetoric in the Strasbourg Anabaptist-Spiritualist Debates, 1530–1531 
264 1 |c 2011 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article assesses the strikingly different rhetoric used in pamphlets published in 1530 by the Strasbourg Spiritualists Christian Entfelder and Johannes Bünderlin. Whilst these texts are most commonly read in light of their shared critique of Anabaptism, this article argues that Bünderlin's work also reveals his rejection of Entfelder's Spiritualist alternative, characterised by the term ‘standing still’ (Stillstand). By exploring these pamphlets, and other texts associated with the Strasbourg Anabaptist-Spiritualist debates, this article seeks to demonstrate the importance not only of fully contextualising such sources, but also of understanding the divisive and potentially destabilising nature of Spiritualist rhetoric itself. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of ecclesiastical history  |d London [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1950  |g 62(2011), 1, Seite 20-37  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)265785375  |w (DE-600)1466476-8  |w (DE-576)078707234  |x 1469-7637  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:62  |g year:2011  |g number:1  |g pages:20-37 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646107268  |k Electronic 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022046909991291  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-ecclesiastical-history/article/standing-still-or-running-on-reconsidering-rhetoric-in-the-strasbourg-anabaptistspiritualist-debates-15301531/E096893A76C2A118294B7AE0F873B5E9  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 403007460X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784770264 
LOK |0 005 20220105044120 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-29#FEF4D4648A1F0867657BEC43B7081A4141473AC2 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw