Romans 4 as Apologetic Theology

In recent years, scholars have maintained that sections of the genuine Pauline epistles (especially 1 and 2 Corinthians) and even entire epistles are selfapologies in which Paul defends his apostleship. In the ancient sources, the term “apology” is not restricted to self-defense; the most characteri...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Guerra, Anthony J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1988
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 1988, Volume: 81, Issue: 3, Pages: 251-270
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1784648477
003 DE-627
005 20220105043155.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s1988 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816000010099  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784648477 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784648477 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Guerra, Anthony J.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Romans 4 as Apologetic Theology 
264 1 |c 1988 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In recent years, scholars have maintained that sections of the genuine Pauline epistles (especially 1 and 2 Corinthians) and even entire epistles are selfapologies in which Paul defends his apostleship. In the ancient sources, the term “apology” is not restricted to self-defense; the most characteristic Jewish Hellenistic apologies were propaganda on behalf of the law rather than an author's defense against personal accusations. Some fifty years ago, Günther Bornkamm proposed that Paul adapted and modified Jewish Hellenistic apologetic traditions in Rom 1:18 — 3:21. For the most part the thesis of Bornkamm's article and its implications for interpreting Romans have been benignly neglected; even those who accept it only emphasize its pertinence specifically for Romans 1–3. Ernst Käsemann, for instance, believes that with Romans 4, Paul fully embraces “rabbinic methods” and other more traditional Jewish modes of argumentation. This article challenges Käsemann's claim and affirms that Romans 4 is best understood as apologetic theology. 
601 |a Apologetik 
601 |a Theologe 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 81(1988), 3, Seite 251-270  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:81  |g year:1988  |g number:3  |g pages:251-270 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1637056060  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509704  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000010099  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/romans-4-as-apologetic-theology/C83F31EC7676AC5610B78E95C1AE680D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 402995281X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784648477 
LOK |0 005 20220105043155 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#0C257BFE0F7BF2764DC8FD1F09C0952BCF214B98 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509704 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 

Similar Items

more