The Logos of Heraclitus: Updating the Report
In 1952 there appeared a short article in Theological Studies entitled “Heraclitus' Alleged Logos Doctrine.” As one may guess from the title, the author, T. F. Glasson, reported to his largely theological audience that the conception of Heraclitus' Logos as a cosmicmetaphysical principle,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1981
|
| In: |
Harvard theological review
Year: 1981, Volume: 74, Issue: 2, Pages: 161-176 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1784647152 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220105043148.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220105s1981 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S001781600003056X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1784647152 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1784647152 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Miller, Ed L. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Logos of Heraclitus: Updating the Report |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1981 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In 1952 there appeared a short article in Theological Studies entitled “Heraclitus' Alleged Logos Doctrine.” As one may guess from the title, the author, T. F. Glasson, reported to his largely theological audience that the conception of Heraclitus' Logos as a cosmicmetaphysical principle, far from being a possible source for the Logos of the Fourth Gospel, rests upon a gigantic mistake. The truth is, rather, that Glasson's report rests upon a gigantic mistake, as well as several lesser ones. At the very least it does not do justice to a quite different interpretation, an interpretation which, indeed, has become in the meantime the “accepted” one. Our task, also intended primarily for theologians and nonspecialists in pre-Socratic philosophy, is to provide a corrected and updated report, and to make a few observations of our own. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Harvard theological review |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908 |g 74(1981), 2, Seite 161-176 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)331504553 |w (DE-600)2051494-3 |w (DE-576)094533326 |x 1475-4517 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:1981 |g number:2 |g pages:161-176 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509445 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S001781600003056X |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/logos-of-heraclitus-updating-the-report/4DC092EED29C8D51E9578521BC01134B |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 402995149X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1784647152 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220105043148 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#4EEEF707A6ED4DA572E377815D1A070A6667AD16 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509445 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||