Hezekiah's Reform and the Deuteronomistic Tradition

The historical reconstruction of biblical events represents a difficult and often speculative task, which is well demonstrated by the various scholarly attempts to understand the reform of Hezekiah and to establish defensible conclusions concerning its historicity. A wide range of scholarly opinion...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rosenbaum, Jonathan (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1979
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 1979, Volume: 72, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 23-44
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1784646679
003 DE-627
005 20220105043145.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s1979 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S001781600002976X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784646679 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784646679 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Rosenbaum, Jonathan  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Hezekiah's Reform and the Deuteronomistic Tradition 
264 1 |c 1979 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The historical reconstruction of biblical events represents a difficult and often speculative task, which is well demonstrated by the various scholarly attempts to understand the reform of Hezekiah and to establish defensible conclusions concerning its historicity. A wide range of scholarly opinion has grown out of fundamental disagreements concerning the accuracy and intent of the two biblical sources which describe Hezekiah's reform. The Deuteronomistic book of 2 Kings and the priestly-oriented later work of 2 Chronicles diverge mightily in their handling of Hezekiah's whole reign and especially the reform. In the early years of critical inquiry, the historicity of pre-Exilic events exclusively reported by the Chronicler was entirely dismissed in most circles. The description of Hezekiah's reform in the Book of Kings was dubbed “a mixture of the general and specific that does not inspire much confidence.” Consequently, it became fashionable to dismiss Hezekiah's religious changes as anachronisms inserted by later writers to parallel the reform of Josiah. 
601 |a Deuteronomist 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 72 (1979), 1-2, Seite 23-44  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:72  |g year:1979  |g number:1/2  |g pages:23-44 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1643765787  |k Non-Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509673  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S001781600002976X  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/hezekiahs-reform-and-the-deuteronomistic-tradition/88A36C0A0ED04B686FE2DDD371063C70  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4029951015 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784646679 
LOK |0 005 20220105043145 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#FABF57FC85E55A289EC5EA13DB43D1952ED00FC6 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509673 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw