Pseudo-Jerome in the Commentary of Andrew of St. Victor on Samuel
The essential conservatism of medieval Biblical exegesis is well illustrated by the sources used by Andrew of St. Victor in his commentary on the books of Samuel. Despite his justified reputation as an exponent of literal exegesis, his originality and his freedom in his handling of his authorities,...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1974
|
| In: |
Harvard theological review
Year: 1974, Volume: 67, Issue: 3, Pages: 195-253 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1784645753 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220105043141.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220105s1974 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0017816000016795 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1784645753 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1784645753 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Saltman, A. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pseudo-Jerome in the Commentary of Andrew of St. Victor on Samuel |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1974 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The essential conservatism of medieval Biblical exegesis is well illustrated by the sources used by Andrew of St. Victor in his commentary on the books of Samuel. Despite his justified reputation as an exponent of literal exegesis, his originality and his freedom in his handling of his authorities, the overall appearance of his commentary is not all that different from the literal portions of the ninth-century commentaries of Rabanus Maurus and Angelomus of Luxeuil, despite the lapse of time and increasing sophistication of approach. Josephus, Jerome, Isidore, Bede, and Pseudo-Jerome continue to hold the field. In fact, in at least one respect there is a recession, as Rabanus and Angelomus knew how to distinguish between Jerome and Pseudo-Jerome (Hebraeus), whereas Andrew did not, and this in spite of his use of Rabanus and Angelomus, who had incorporated substantial chunks of Pseudo-Jerome into their commentaries. | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Harvard theological review |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908 |g 67(1974), 3, Seite 195-253 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)331504553 |w (DE-600)2051494-3 |w (DE-576)094533326 |x 1475-4517 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:67 |g year:1974 |g number:3 |g pages:195-253 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509222 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000016795 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/pseudojerome-in-the-commentary-of-andrew-of-st-victor-on-samuel/7CED00D0AA6EE2CD228727D4F7E9BCE4 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4029950094 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1784645753 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220105043141 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#B04E48E8AE9EE0F8196C9D0EE22F12E97927AD5B | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1509222 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||