The Barth-Feuerbach Confrontation

The name of Feuerbach is usually associated with the philosophic critique of religion. Feuerbach is seen, and quite rightly so, as the spokesman par excellence for the philosophic attack of religion — an attack launched from the anthropocentric viewpoint of modern cultural awareness against transcen...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vogel, Manfred H. 1930-2013 (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1966
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 1966, Volume: 59, Issue: 1, Pages: 27-52
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1784645079
003 DE-627
005 20220106002632.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s1966 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816000002935  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784645079 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784645079 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1187380474  |0 (DE-627)1666531707  |4 aut  |a Vogel, Manfred H.  |d 1930-2013 
109 |a Vogel, Manfred H. 1930-2013  |a Vogel, Manfred 1930-2013  |a Vogel, M. H. 1930-2013  |a Vogel, Manfred Henry 1930-2013  |a Vogel, Fred 1930-2013 
245 1 4 |a The Barth-Feuerbach Confrontation 
264 1 |c 1966 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The name of Feuerbach is usually associated with the philosophic critique of religion. Feuerbach is seen, and quite rightly so, as the spokesman par excellence for the philosophic attack of religion — an attack launched from the anthropocentric viewpoint of modern cultural awareness against transcendental religion. There is no question but that Feuerbach has given a most vivid, forceful and persistent expression to this philosophic critique. But it should be also clear that his contribution here is precisely this and nothing more. The substance and basic outline of the critique are not the unique or distinctive contribution of Feuerbach. They had been formulated long before Feuerbach and expressed repeatedly throughout the history of Western philosophy before and after Feuerbach. Thus, while Feuerbach still remains an excellent representative and spokesman for this critique, he is by no means the only one. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 59(1966), 1, Seite 27-52  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:59  |g year:1966  |g number:1  |g pages:27-52 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508425  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000002935  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/barthfeuerbach-confrontation/05F9A3731B4D86C8E086348389730A2D  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 59  |j 1966  |e 1  |h 27-52 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 402994941X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784645079 
LOK |0 005 20220105043137 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#C8963B5781A01D2D879E6D9305081EFE2F335012 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508425 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw