Monopolar Theism and the Ontological Argument
Monopolar and dipolar are terms brought but comparatively recently into vogue in theological discussions by Charles Hartshorne, the American philosopher. The distinction intended by the two concepts has been made the basis for contrasting views of theism consequent upon man's rational reflectio...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1965
|
| In: |
Harvard theological review
Year: 1965, Volume: 58, Issue: 4, Pages: 387-416 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1784645036 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220106002632.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220105s1965 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0017816000002601 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1784645036 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1784645036 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)138354367 |0 (DE-627)696541009 |0 (DE-576)307270378 |4 aut |a McDonald, Hugh D. | |
| 109 | |a McDonald, Hugh D. |a Mc Donald, Hugh D. |a McDonald, H. D. |a MacDonald, Hugh D. |a McDonald, Hugh Dermot | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Monopolar Theism and the Ontological Argument |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1965 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Monopolar and dipolar are terms brought but comparatively recently into vogue in theological discussions by Charles Hartshorne, the American philosopher. The distinction intended by the two concepts has been made the basis for contrasting views of theism consequent upon man's rational reflection upon the divine Object in whom he finds satisfaction for his more fundamental emotional and practical needs and his primary worship of Him. According to certain modern philosophers of religion man has rightly interpreted the idea of God suggested by this satisfaction and this worship in theistic terms. The issue, however, concerns the correct statement of this implied theism. According to Hartshorne, historical theism has been altogether conditioned by Greek philosophy, and has become, as a result, definable exclusively according to its concepts. Classical theism, as it is called, has therefore its origin in the notions of Plato and Aristotle rather than in the Hebrew and Christian scriptures. “Not the Gospels and the Old Testament,” declares Hartshorne, “but Greek philosophy was the decisive source for the Classical idea of divine perfection.” | ||
| 601 | |a Ontologie | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Harvard theological review |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908 |g 58(1965), 4, Seite 387-416 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)331504553 |w (DE-600)2051494-3 |w (DE-576)094533326 |x 1475-4517 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:58 |g year:1965 |g number:4 |g pages:387-416 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508548 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000002601 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/monopolar-theism-and-the-ontological-argument/ABADDC826637DB9B246CFBCA4462DB53 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4029949371 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1784645036 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220105043137 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#9830216CAC9A442127625985EED68D4649091C03 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508548 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||