The Old Testament of the Early Church (A Study in Canon)

For three-quarters of a century the hypothesis of an Alexandrian canon has been the commonly accepted solution to the problem of how the Jewish canon and the Old Testament of the early church came to differ. That hypothesis suggests that a larger canon of scriptures was initiated in Alexandria and c...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sundberg, Albert C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1958
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 1958, Volume: 51, Issue: 4, Pages: 205-226
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1784643785
003 DE-627
005 20220105043131.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s1958 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S0017816000028662  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784643785 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784643785 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sundberg, Albert C.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Sundberg, Albert C.  |a Sundberg, Albert Carl 
245 1 4 |a The Old Testament of the Early Church (A Study in Canon) 
264 1 |c 1958 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a For three-quarters of a century the hypothesis of an Alexandrian canon has been the commonly accepted solution to the problem of how the Jewish canon and the Old Testament of the early church came to differ. That hypothesis suggests that a larger canon of scriptures was initiated in Alexandria and circulated throughout Diaspora Judaism than what obtained in Palestine. The Christian church, becoming predominantly Gentile early in its history, adopted this enlarged canon, that included the books of the Apocrypha, from Diaspora Judaism. The hypothesis represents essentially a geographic distinction in canonical usage between Palestinian Judaism and Alexandrian and Dispersion Judaism. It is the opinion of the present writer that the Alexandrian canon hypothesis is not only unprovable, as Pfeiffer has recognized, but is erroneous. This opinion is based (1) on a study of the history of the Alexandrian canon hypothesis, (2) on an examination of the arguments favoring the hypothesis, and (3) on a re-evaluation of the status of canonical usage in Judaism at the time of the emergence of Christianity into the world. 
601 |a Testament 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 51(1958), 4, Seite 205-226  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:51  |g year:1958  |g number:4  |g pages:205-226 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508703  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000028662  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/old-testament-of-the-early-church-a-study-in-canon/0A321FC0D44B9ADA0941242BC5D580C0  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 402994812X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784643785 
LOK |0 005 20220105043131 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#14161097C41AC9317E5AB3E0C523BC617A897A85 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1508703 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw