Is the Design Argument Dead?
The basis of theistic belief is fortunately broader than the theistic arguments. People believe in God before they argue in favor of His existence, and the fortunes of theism are not inseparably bound up with any of the arguments framed in its support. No one, however, who is interested in the ratio...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
1919
|
| En: |
Harvard theological review
Año: 1919, Volumen: 12, Número: 3, Páginas: 315-328 |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1784637238 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220105043057.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220105s1919 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S001781600001066X |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1784637238 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1784637238 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Johnson, William Hallock |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is the Design Argument Dead? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1919 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The basis of theistic belief is fortunately broader than the theistic arguments. People believe in God before they argue in favor of His existence, and the fortunes of theism are not inseparably bound up with any of the arguments framed in its support. No one, however, who is interested in the rational basis of theology can be indifferent to the fate of an argument which, whatever the philosophical objections to be brought against it, has in all ages of the world made a powerful appeal to human reason. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Harvard theological review |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908 |g 12(1919), 3, Seite 315-328 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)331504553 |w (DE-600)2051494-3 |w (DE-576)094533326 |x 1475-4517 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:1919 |g number:3 |g pages:315-328 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1507768 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S001781600001066X |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/is-the-design-argument-dead/91F5788CCB9EF4A9AF460937BAA57C3F |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 12 |j 1919 |e 3 |h 315-328 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4029941575 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1784637238 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220105043057 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#09A39F99A54E95B4A7171E4767311B46CC8FDDB0 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1507768 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||