Is the Design Argument Dead?

The basis of theistic belief is fortunately broader than the theistic arguments. People believe in God before they argue in favor of His existence, and the fortunes of theism are not inseparably bound up with any of the arguments framed in its support. No one, however, who is interested in the ratio...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johnson, William Hallock (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1919
In: Harvard theological review
Year: 1919, Volume: 12, Issue: 3, Pages: 315-328
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1784637238
003 DE-627
005 20220105043057.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220105s1919 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1017/S001781600001066X  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1784637238 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1784637238 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Johnson, William Hallock  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Is the Design Argument Dead? 
264 1 |c 1919 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The basis of theistic belief is fortunately broader than the theistic arguments. People believe in God before they argue in favor of His existence, and the fortunes of theism are not inseparably bound up with any of the arguments framed in its support. No one, however, who is interested in the rational basis of theology can be indifferent to the fate of an argument which, whatever the philosophical objections to be brought against it, has in all ages of the world made a powerful appeal to human reason. 
601 |a Argumentation 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Harvard theological review  |d Cambridge : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1908  |g 12(1919), 3, Seite 315-328  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)331504553  |w (DE-600)2051494-3  |w (DE-576)094533326  |x 1475-4517  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:12  |g year:1919  |g number:3  |g pages:315-328 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/1507768  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S001781600001066X  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/harvard-theological-review/article/is-the-design-argument-dead/91F5788CCB9EF4A9AF460937BAA57C3F  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 12  |j 1919  |e 3  |h 315-328 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4029941575 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1784637238 
LOK |0 005 20220105043057 
LOK |0 008 220105||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#09A39F99A54E95B4A7171E4767311B46CC8FDDB0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/1507768 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw