Nothing Personal: Blavatsky and Her Indian Interlocutors
The Theosophical Society was an influential transnational religious movement founded by H. P. Blavatsky and others in 1875. With its theology of the impersonal Divine, Theosophy was particularly influential on the New Age, which inherited a propensity to see the divine in impersonal terms. Offering...
| Published in: | Numen |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2022
|
| In: |
Numen
|
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Blavatsky, Helena P. 1831-1891
/ Subba Row, Tiruvalum 1856-1890
/ Chatterji, Mohini M. 1858-1936
/ Theosophy
/ Advaita
/ Idea of God
|
| IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AX Inter-religious relations AZ New religious movements BK Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism NBC Doctrine of God TJ Modern history |
| Further subjects: | B
J. S. Mill
B Brahmo Samaj B Theosophical Society B H. P. Blavatsky B Mohini Chatterji B impersonal Divine B T. Subba Row B Transculturality |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The Theosophical Society was an influential transnational religious movement founded by H. P. Blavatsky and others in 1875. With its theology of the impersonal Divine, Theosophy was particularly influential on the New Age, which inherited a propensity to see the divine in impersonal terms. Offering a corrective to the recent historiographical tendency that focuses solely on Theosophy’s Western aspects, this article analyzes Blavatsky’s written “conversations” on the nature of the Divine with two Indian Theosphists, T. Subba Row (1856–1890) and Mohini Chatterji (1858–1936). Contextualizing these discussions both globally and locally, it reveals Blavatsky’s engagement with Subba Row’s Vedantic reading of John Stuart Mill and her concurrent rejection of Mohini’s Brahmo-Samaj inspired theism. The article considers the power dynamics that lay behind these negotiations. It argues that they involved a mutual drive for legitimacy and were the result of complex transcultural encounters that resist reductionist historiographical tendencies. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1568-5276 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Numen
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15685276-12341648 |