“Reformed Theosis?”: A Response to Gannon Murphy
Any attempt to reclaim Orthodox aspects of the “great tradition” for contemporary theology is to be applauded. In this light, Gannon Murphy has done the church a real service in stimulating discussion surrounding the compatibility of an Orthodox notion of theosis with contemporary Reformed theology....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2009
|
| In: |
Theology today
Year: 2009, Volume: 65, Issue: 4, Pages: 489-498 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1784233072 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211231020827.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211230s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/004057360906500407 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1784233072 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1784233072 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)139300872 |0 (DE-627)609823949 |0 (DE-576)310903408 |4 aut |a Habets, Myk |d 1971- | |
| 109 | |a Habets, Myk 1971- |a Habets, Michael 1971- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a “Reformed Theosis?”: A Response to Gannon Murphy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2009 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Any attempt to reclaim Orthodox aspects of the “great tradition” for contemporary theology is to be applauded. In this light, Gannon Murphy has done the church a real service in stimulating discussion surrounding the compatibility of an Orthodox notion of theosis with contemporary Reformed theology.1 Having argued the same thing previously, I stand beside Murphy as a brother in arms.2 There are, however, differing views on how best to incorporate theosis and Reformed thought. In this essay, I point out areas of agreement between Murphy and myself, discuss a number of areas in which I disagree with Murphy's proposal, and finally offer a brief reflection on how I think Reformed theology and a doctrine of theosis are compatible. At the outset I wish to affirm my agreement with Murphy and make it clear that we share much in common despite our disagreements.3 | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology today |d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1944 |g 65(2009), 4, Seite 489-498 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341343897 |w (DE-600)2067097-7 |w (DE-576)325341001 |x 2044-2556 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:65 |g year:2009 |g number:4 |g pages:489-498 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/004057360906500407 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4027976142 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1784233072 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211230043940 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211230||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-20#44AFF8502DF163559C89B16A147C70AA3F212151 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||