The Place of the Past in Theological Construction
This article discusses the views of three liberal theologians, L. Cady, D. Brown, and S. G. Davaney, on the place of the past in theological construction. They all attempt to keep in balance both a historicist view of epistemology as well as an insistence on the continued usefulness of the past for...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
2007
|
| In: |
Theology today
Year: 2007, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 201-220 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1784231800 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211231020819.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211230s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/004057360706400206 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1784231800 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1784231800 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)138768897 |0 (DE-627)703098519 |0 (DE-576)306001810 |4 aut |a Vidu, Adonis | |
| 109 | |a Vidu, Adonis | ||
| 245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Place of the Past in Theological Construction |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article discusses the views of three liberal theologians, L. Cady, D. Brown, and S. G. Davaney, on the place of the past in theological construction. They all attempt to keep in balance both a historicist view of epistemology as well as an insistence on the continued usefulness of the past for theology. In the process, the meaning of the past gets radically altered. I argue that Cady fails to make coherent her notion of “creative extension” because of the unity she ascribes to the whole of tradition. Brown deconstructs this unity, but to such an extent that tradition becomes a mere generic term for whatever “authors” human identities. Finally, Davaney's radicalizing of Brown ends up identifying theology with ethnography, surrendering its distinctiveness. | ||
| 601 | |a Theologe | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology today |d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1944 |g 64(2007), 2, Seite 201-220 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341343897 |w (DE-600)2067097-7 |w (DE-576)325341001 |x 2044-2556 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:64 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:201-220 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/004057360706400206 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 64 |j 2007 |e 2 |h 201-220 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4027974875 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1784231800 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211230043938 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211230||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-20#3A823025EF1565190BB886410FE7A5FE5420A461 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||