How historical is the Resurrection?: (A Dialogue)
The following dialogue is an imaginary conversation between four prominent modern theologians. The topic is the resurrection of Jesus as an historical event. My choice of Barth, Bultmann, Pannenberg, and Moltmann as participants in the dialogue no doubt reflects my own theological odyssey. But it al...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publ.
1976
|
| In: |
Theology today
Year: 1976, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 5-14 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 178419459X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211231020509.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211230s1976 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/004057367603300104 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)178419459X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP178419459X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)136768563 |0 (DE-627)587240768 |0 (DE-576)168829185 |4 aut |a Migliore, Daniel L. |d 1935- | |
| 109 | |a Migliore, Daniel L. 1935- |a Migliore, Daniel Leo 1935- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How historical is the Resurrection?: (A Dialogue) |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1976 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The following dialogue is an imaginary conversation between four prominent modern theologians. The topic is the resurrection of Jesus as an historical event. My choice of Barth, Bultmann, Pannenberg, and Moltmann as participants in the dialogue no doubt reflects my own theological odyssey. But it also has a more objective basis. These theologians represent the four currently most influential interpretations of the New Testament witness to the resurrection.I have tried to be fair in stating the four positions and the ways in which they both agree and clash with each other. The theologians in the dialogue prove to be both abrasive and occasionally humorous. I have seldom been party to a good theological discussion which did not contain a bit of both of these qualities. Finally, I should explain that the dialogue form is used to solicit the reader's own engagement in the on-going discussion. | ||
| 601 | |a Resurrection | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology today |d London [u.a.] : Sage Publ., 1944 |g 33(1976), 1, Seite 5-14 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341343897 |w (DE-600)2067097-7 |w (DE-576)325341001 |x 2044-2556 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:1976 |g number:1 |g pages:5-14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/004057367603300104 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 1976 |e 1 |h 5-14 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 402793766X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 178419459X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211230043827 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211230||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-20#15335E433F41A6C41579D70EA1FECBCACCC220A2 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||