Fundamentalism in American Religion and Law: Obama's Challenge to Patriarchy's Threat to Democracy
Homosexual marriage and unfettered access to abortion (including partial-birth abortion) are aspects of a fundamental constitutionally guaranteed “right to intimate life,” claims David A. J. Richards. If they are part of such a basic constitutional right, why have they not been acknowledged? Why do...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2011
|
| In: |
A journal of church and state
Year: 2011, Volume: 53, Issue: 1, Pages: 137-139 |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1783935685 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20211229224829.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 211229s2011 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jcs/csr017 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1783935685 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1783935685 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1046210025 |0 (DE-627)776676342 |0 (DE-576)399494782 |4 aut |a Grondelski, John M. | |
| 109 | |a Grondelski, John M. |a Grondelski, John | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fundamentalism in American Religion and Law: Obama's Challenge to Patriarchy's Threat to Democracy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Homosexual marriage and unfettered access to abortion (including partial-birth abortion) are aspects of a fundamental constitutionally guaranteed “right to intimate life,” claims David A. J. Richards. If they are part of such a basic constitutional right, why have they not been acknowledged? Why do advocates of an “originalist” approach to constitutional exegesis so vehemently oppose them?, The answer, claims Richards, is the continuing hold of “patriarchy” that is the supposed heritage of both judicial originalists and politically active religious “fundamentalists” (which, for Richards, encompasses Roman Catholics, evangelical Protestants, and Mormons). | ||
| 601 | |a Fundament | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Challenger | ||
| 655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t A journal of church and state |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1959 |g 53(2011), 1, Seite 137-139 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341338435 |w (DE-600)2066547-7 |w (DE-576)10720486X |x 2040-4867 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:53 |g year:2011 |g number:1 |g pages:137-139 |
| 856 | |3 Volltext |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23921960 |x JSTOR | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jcs/csr017 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/jcs/article/53/1/137/772293 |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4027624750 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1783935685 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211229044926 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-16#C47EDC43DA78A8C574D8CC137E726493A956EF03 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 866 |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23921960 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||