Divine Analogy in Eighteenth-Century Irish Philosophy

In eighteenth-century Ireland, attempts to explain divine predication led to the belief that analogy provides a viable way through which we can know things about God. This belief, in turn, resulted in a controversy over divine analogy which involved numerous philosophers and theologians of the perio...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Curtin, Thomas (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2014
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2014, Volume: 65, Issue: 2, Pages: 600-624
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783737425
003 DE-627
005 20211229043554.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/flu069  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783737425 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783737425 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Curtin, Thomas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Curtin, Thomas 
245 1 0 |a Divine Analogy in Eighteenth-Century Irish Philosophy 
264 1 |c 2014 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In eighteenth-century Ireland, attempts to explain divine predication led to the belief that analogy provides a viable way through which we can know things about God. This belief, in turn, resulted in a controversy over divine analogy which involved numerous philosophers and theologians of the period. This essay explains how three figures in the debate understood analogy and how that understanding influenced their positions on divine analogy: William King, Peter Browne, and George Berkeley. At the height of this controversy an anonymous letter was sent to Browne, which is perhaps the best response to Browne's account. I argue that this letter is important if we are to gain a full understanding of the controversy, for two reasons. First, the letter advocates a literal explanation of divine predication and, in so doing, provides a conception of wisdom that is more detailed than other responses to Browne. Second, the letter provides the most substantial treatment of a specific argument against Browne, which focuses on how we come to know divine powers: the literal ascription of some power (e.g. wisdom) does not require that we have direct acquaintance with that power's intrinsic activity. 
601 |a Philosophie 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 65(2014), 2, Seite 600-624  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:65  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:600-624 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n elektronische Ausgabe  |w (DE-627)1640975292  |k Electronic 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43665442  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flu069  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/65/2/600/2952510  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027425901 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783737425 
LOK |0 005 20211229043554 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-28#28073C9431BBE5A453B0532391B6433955D212A9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43665442 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw