God in the Age of Science? A Critique of Religious Reason. By Herman Philipse

Herman Philipse has produced a book very much in the tradition of John Mackie’s The Miracle of Theism. Philipse’s God in the Age of Science? is a sustained critique of the contemporary philosophical defence of theism, focusing largely on critically evaluating the work of Richard Swinburne. The book...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taliaferro, Charles (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2013
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 856-864
Review of:God in the age of science? (Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2012) (Taliaferro, Charles)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783733551
003 DE-627
005 20211229223310.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2013 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/flt150  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783733551 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783733551 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Taliaferro, Charles  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a God in the Age of Science? A Critique of Religious Reason. By Herman Philipse 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Herman Philipse has produced a book very much in the tradition of John Mackie’s The Miracle of Theism. Philipse’s God in the Age of Science? is a sustained critique of the contemporary philosophical defence of theism, focusing largely on critically evaluating the work of Richard Swinburne. The book is not as nuanced and rigorous as Mackie’s work, probably because the scope and conclusions are more ambitious than The Miracle of Theism. Mackie held that theism is implausible, but not incoherent, whereas Philipse argues for both the implausibility and the incoherence of theism. There are three parts: ‘Natural Theology’, ‘Theism as a Theory’, and ‘The Probability of Theism’. If Philipse is correct, it is unreasonable to accept traditional forms of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. 
601 |a Philipse, Herman 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 64(2013), 2, Seite 856-864  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:64  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:856-864 
787 0 8 |i Rezension von  |a Philipse, Herman, 1951 -   |t God in the age of science?  |b 1. publ.  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Oxford Univ. Press, 2012  |h XVI, 372 S.  |w (DE-627)670412686  |w (DE-576)356427633  |z 0199697531  |z 9780199697533 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971569  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flt150  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/64/2/856/1716016  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027422031 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783733551 
LOK |0 005 20211229043538 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#A0F94F0B2D5FD7A2673D81359E081DF0C3417918 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971569 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 

Similar Items

more