Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. By David M. Moffitt

David Moffitt’s published version of his doctoral dissertation (completed at Duke under Richard B. Hays in 2010) presents a robust case for a bold thesis: far from being an oversight or deliberate omission, the resurrection is an essential presupposition in the Letter to the Hebrews and is in partic...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Moore, Nicholas J. 1984- (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2013
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2013, Volume: 64, Issue: 2, Pages: 673-675
Review of:Atonement and the logic of resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Leiden : Brill, 2011) (Moore, Nicholas J.)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783732814
003 DE-627
005 20211229223307.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2013 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/flt065  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783732814 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783732814 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1052369383  |0 (DE-627)788452436  |0 (DE-576)408116218  |4 aut  |a Moore, Nicholas J.  |d 1984- 
109 |a Moore, Nicholas J. 1984- 
245 1 0 |a Atonement and the Logic of Resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews. By David M. Moffitt 
264 1 |c 2013 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a David Moffitt’s published version of his doctoral dissertation (completed at Duke under Richard B. Hays in 2010) presents a robust case for a bold thesis: far from being an oversight or deliberate omission, the resurrection is an essential presupposition in the Letter to the Hebrews and is in particular logically central to the text’s understanding of atonement., The first chapter sets out the modern scholarly consensus that the resurrection is all but absent from Hebrews. Moffitt identifies a common assumption that Hebrews operates with a two-stage death/exaltation model based on the importance of these two moments in Yom Kippur; this misunderstanding of sacrifice is addressed in chapter 4., Chapter 2 argues that Hebrews 1–2 presupposes the necessity of Jesus’ resurrection. 
601 |a Resurrection 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 64(2013), 2, Seite 673-675  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:64  |g year:2013  |g number:2  |g pages:673-675 
787 0 8 |i Rezension von  |a Moffitt, David M., 1974 -   |t Atonement and the logic of resurrection in the Epistle to the Hebrews  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |h XIX, 338 S  |w (DE-627)664065392  |w (DE-576)347999700  |z 9789004206519 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971494  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flt065  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/64/2/673/1715748  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027421299 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783732814 
LOK |0 005 20211229043535 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#8FD3013F9A84B6A8C319556F2FB1E0C76C0DA325 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/23971494 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 

Similar Items

more