Clement of Alexandria’s Reference to Luke the Evangelist as Author of Jason and Papiscus

A strange quotation from Clement of Alexandria’s now lost Hypotyposeis, preserved in the Areopagite material within the writings of Maximus Confessor/John of Scythopolis, claims that Luke the Evangelist wrote the Jewish–Christian dialogue Jason and Papiscus. This information seems so fantastic that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tolley, Harry (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2012
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2012, Volume: 63, Issue: 2, Pages: 523-532
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783730854
003 DE-627
005 20211229043526.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/fls139  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783730854 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783730854 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Tolley, Harry  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Tolley, Harry 
245 1 0 |a Clement of Alexandria’s Reference to Luke the Evangelist as Author of Jason and Papiscus 
264 1 |c 2012 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A strange quotation from Clement of Alexandria’s now lost Hypotyposeis, preserved in the Areopagite material within the writings of Maximus Confessor/John of Scythopolis, claims that Luke the Evangelist wrote the Jewish–Christian dialogue Jason and Papiscus. This information seems so fantastic that several scholars have attempted to explain away the attribution through the composition of various hypotheses. The most popular of these was published by Johannes Ernest Grabe in his Spicilegium SS Patrum in 1698. Despite being cited by scholars from the eighteenth to the twenty-first century, Grabe’s hypothesis has never been the subject of a detailed investigation. Two conclusions result from an investigation of his hypothesis: Grabe’s claims of textual corruption are unfounded; and it seems clear that Clement actually did claim Lukan authorship for Jason and Papiscus. 
601 |a Alexandria 
601 |a Evangelist 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 63(2012), 2, Seite 523-532  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:63  |g year:2012  |g number:2  |g pages:523-532 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/24638156  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/fls139  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/63/2/523/1670445  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 63  |j 2012  |e 2  |h 523-532 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027419332 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783730854 
LOK |0 005 20211229043526 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#0AB0E58C0D2CB6E3C08215FEBDE36F85C16EA7E4 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/24638156 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw