Rethinking the Origins of the Eucharist. By Martin Stringer

This work is yet another revival of the dual-origin hypothesis as proposed by Spitta, and which is best known through the work of Lietzmann. In terms of previous attempts the argument is perhaps closest to that of Fuller, of whose work Stringer is apparently unaware. Like Fuller, he suggests that th...

全面介绍

Saved in:  
书目详细资料
主要作者: Stewart-Sykes, Alistair (Author)
格式: 电子 Review
语言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
载入...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
出版: Oxford University Press 2011
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2011, 卷: 62, 发布: 2, Pages: 735-736
Review of:Rethinking the origins of the Eucharist (London : SCM Press, 2011) (Stewart-Sykes, Alistair)
Further subjects:B 书评
在线阅读: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
实物特征
总结:This work is yet another revival of the dual-origin hypothesis as proposed by Spitta, and which is best known through the work of Lietzmann. In terms of previous attempts the argument is perhaps closest to that of Fuller, of whose work Stringer is apparently unaware. Like Fuller, he suggests that the meal regulated by Paul in 1 Corinthians was not a weekly gathering but a Passover meal. The problem with this hypothesis, historically, is that of explaining how an annual event might lend meaning to a weekly event. Stringer solves this, whilst unaware of previous debate, by suggesting that the eucharist had not originally been weekly, but that a weekly gathering was a later development., This suggestion that there was no weekly meal gathering is the most interesting part of the argument.
ISSN:1477-4607
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jts/flr114