Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status. By James Anderson

Paradox in Christian Theology addresses two important questions: ‘Are any essential Christian doctrines genuinely paradoxical?’ and ‘Can a person rationally believe a paradoxical doctrine?’ Part I treats the first question, while Part II tackles the second. Anderson’s sustained analysis of the issue...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Harrison, Victoria S. (Author)
Format: Electronic Review
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2010
In: The journal of theological studies
Year: 2010, Volume: 61, Issue: 1, Pages: 474-476
Review of:Paradox in Christian theology (Milton Keynes [u. a.] : Paternoster, 2007) (Harrison, Victoria S.)
Further subjects:B Book review
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1783727101
003 DE-627
005 20211229223245.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 211229s2010 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jts/flp166  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1783727101 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1783727101 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Harrison, Victoria S.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Paradox in Christian Theology: An Analysis of its Presence, Character, and Epistemic Status. By James Anderson 
264 1 |c 2010 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Paradox in Christian Theology addresses two important questions: ‘Are any essential Christian doctrines genuinely paradoxical?’ and ‘Can a person rationally believe a paradoxical doctrine?’ Part I treats the first question, while Part II tackles the second. Anderson’s sustained analysis of the issues raised by these questions is a model of fruitful interchange between recent work in analytic philosophy of religion and systematic theology., In Part I Anderson defends the claim that at least two core Christian doctrines are paradoxical—namely, the doctrines of the Trinity and the incarnation. Chapter 2 argues at length that the doctrine of the Trinity is paradoxical. 
601 |a Theologe 
601 |a Episteme 
655 7 |a Rezension  |0 (DE-588)4049712-4  |0 (DE-627)106186019  |0 (DE-576)209083166  |2 gnd-content 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t The journal of theological studies  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1899  |g 61(2010), 1, Seite 474-476  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)341339555  |w (DE-600)2066662-7  |w (DE-576)098474553  |x 1477-4607  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:61  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:474-476 
787 0 8 |i Rezension von  |a Anderson, James, 1973 -   |t Paradox in Christian theology  |d Milton Keynes [u. a.] : Paternoster, 2007  |h XII, 328 S.  |w (DE-627)543353362  |w (DE-576)274645289  |z 1842274627  |z 9781842274620 
856 |3 Volltext  |u http://www.jstor.org/stable/43665131  |x JSTOR 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jts/flp166  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jts/article/61/1/474/1673957  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4027415582 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1783727101 
LOK |0 005 20211229043511 
LOK |0 008 211229||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-12-23#906073EDE0C674B6AA23169EEBDCE1FDF4F6A806 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 866   |x JSTOR#http://www.jstor.org/stable/43665131 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixrk  |a zota 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 

Similar Items

more